Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
以往，各地“即买即退”服务往往仅覆盖本地口岸离境业务。跨城市旅行，体验难免打折。对此，多地正探索破题：广东省内，天津与北京，重庆与四川、云南、陕西、甘肃等地，已实现离境退税“即买即退”口岸离境互认办理。例如，境外旅客在重庆离境退税“即买即退”商店购物退税后，可以自行选择从成都天府国际机场、昆明长水国际机场、西安咸阳国际机场、兰州中川国际机场等完成退税核验后离境。
，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
Несколько лет назад мужчина получил условный срок за кражу телефона у прохожего, но не отмечался в инспекции, поэтому его задержали в столичном метро и повезли в суд.
Что думаешь? Оцени!
生活能力培养第一件事是控制住自己